With unemployment is any social temperature rising There is a real excitement about the testPoetry lyricism spectacular images humorI does not have a single English furniture6 of market share in Europe compared to 22The unsuccessful will be many including in the ranks of the French banks to increase the profitability of their investmentsTheir lifestyle is resolutely contemporaryOf course it is often that of a rise in verbalRed orange blue emerald green overseasA compromise was found with the UMP on the financing of the RSA. This guarantees you it unanimous support from the right
The parliamentary discussion that opens will allow to clarify the discussion. We have a pattern of funding likely to give satisfaction to everyone. It does not affect work and there is a fact franchise popular savings since the booklet A is not concerned. About 1.5 billion euros of revenues expected, 10 of the households with the highest heritage will pay more than half.
But the beneficiaries of the tax Shield will be unaffected, the risk of the left refrain...
This debate on the symbolism of the inclusion of the RSA contribution tax Shield will allow the implementation of a true measure applied to the left as a right for years: tax niches global limits. In practical terms, very wealthy people can no longer escape totally from tax.
It is a much larger signal of social justice. The overall ceiling will yield approximately EUR 150 million, or three times more than the cost of the integration of the RSA contribution tax shield. And the effect will be concentrated on the rich, while a majority of beneficiaries of the shield are of modest households.
That you meet Michel Rocard, who spoke a form of "cynicism to inequality
I got it on the phone and he has not spoken me of cynicism. He hoped that everyone would vote for the RSA, a beautiful reform in his eyes. It is rare and this plume the father of one reform the RMI enthusiasm for the device that will replace it. In 1988, the right voted for the creation of the minimum integration income proposed by the left, which had then explained that she restored the wealth solidarity tax to finance. EWB right just delete. Twenty years ago, on a critical topic, the right not to is not stolen. A time where the purpose of reform must lead not to a handkerchief on his beliefs, but where are its priorities. If it is determined the RSA in terms of efficiency and justice, it must go!
It is a measure of left
It is a measure of right and left. We are working for three years with personalities from all sides. Who will watch the outcome of the vote Millions of have-nots. It is a signal of solidarity they expect. Do not vote the reform, it would be to say: "your return to work, your output of poverty, it did not constitute a contribution of 1.1 on revenue from capital."
Olivier Besancenot, stated yesterday that the RSA would increase the precariousness and poverty...
When doubt on reform is constructive, it is welcome. But I still have a certainty: poverty exists and the RSA will fight them. That it focuses on experimentation. We observe no more than partial time, wage freezes. A revolutionary party advocating the status quo, there a moment where it should not extend too far the paradox.
The economic downturn results in destruction of jobs. The RSA likely to suffer
The context makes it even more urgent reform. The RSA is an element of support of the purchasing power of growth. It must be a part of the active population is not excluded from employment. There are needs labour unmet in many sectors, which will increase in view of demography. Let not this phenomenon coexist with mass unemployment.
But the cost of the RSA could go awry...
No, because it finances the complement of income for resumption and employment for people in employment, not bedrock base. The RSA is to the contrary generate significant savings. In Hérault, for example, RMI spending decrease two to three times faster in areas where the RSA is experienced.
